<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prime Time For TV Biz To Step Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.littyhoops.com/2010/01/25/tv-industry-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.littyhoops.com/2010/01/25/tv-industry-ideas/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 06:10:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Medved</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.littyhoops.com/2010/01/25/tv-industry-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Medved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog.littyhoops.com/?p=359#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>Great post!  I&#039;m with you on dropping cable, as soon as I can access the best sports content on the web.  The big issue as you point out is bundling.

As we saw with CSTV, there is so much quality content that&#039;s not being distributed online today by rights holders.  Even if it&#039;s available, it&#039;s typically bundled with some linear TV subscription.

Given the dollars at stake for the leagues with their legacy broadcast partners, you can see why most are hesitant to go a la carte online.

Today, the masses have little awareness of internet-connected TVs.  We&#039;ll be stuck with a significantly bundled system until there&#039;s a broader internet-ready audience ready to support an a la carte, online premium video world.  The market should get there, but it will take time.

I think startups are unlikely to compete successfully from a content perspective given rights fees.  Businesses that could win are services that deliver a better user experience, for accessing content a la Boxee, discovering content, or enabling personalized, interactive content around video.  Simplicity and curation are key to any of these services given the glut of non-premium content crowding the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  I&#8217;m with you on dropping cable, as soon as I can access the best sports content on the web.  The big issue as you point out is bundling.</p>
<p>As we saw with CSTV, there is so much quality content that&#8217;s not being distributed online today by rights holders.  Even if it&#8217;s available, it&#8217;s typically bundled with some linear TV subscription.</p>
<p>Given the dollars at stake for the leagues with their legacy broadcast partners, you can see why most are hesitant to go a la carte online.</p>
<p>Today, the masses have little awareness of internet-connected TVs.  We&#8217;ll be stuck with a significantly bundled system until there&#8217;s a broader internet-ready audience ready to support an a la carte, online premium video world.  The market should get there, but it will take time.</p>
<p>I think startups are unlikely to compete successfully from a content perspective given rights fees.  Businesses that could win are services that deliver a better user experience, for accessing content a la Boxee, discovering content, or enabling personalized, interactive content around video.  Simplicity and curation are key to any of these services given the glut of non-premium content crowding the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

